Skip to content
Grow In Backyard

What America Actually Wants From Its Backyard Animals

We classified 43,306 backyard and gardening search terms by what the searcher wanted. Across the 14 animals with enough data to report, searches about feeding, lifespan and habitat outnumber searches about removal by 3.5 to one.

Last updated 2026-10-23

3.5×More care searches than removal searches
43,306Keywords classified
14Animals above the reporting floor

What people want, by animal

Each bar is the share of that animal’s classified search volume. Someone asking how long squirrels live and someone asking how to repel them are both counted, and the bar shows which is more common.

Care for it Get rid of it
Pond fish
Chickens
Deer
Squirrels
Lizards
Slugs & snails
Chipmunks
Wild birds
Ducks
Snakes
Frogs & toads
Groundhogs
Moles
Geese

Three findings worth the headline

1. The squirrel is not the enemy people assume

Squirrels carry the reputation of a garden pest, and the search data does not agree. Of the 73,756 classified monthly searches naming squirrels, nine in ten are people asking how long they live, what to feed them and where they sleep. How long do squirrels live alone runs at 14,800 searches a month — more than every squirrel-removal term in the corpus put together, and where they shelter is not far behind.

2. Deer are forgiven almost everything

Deer do more measurable damage to gardens than any animal on this list, and only about one search in ten is about stopping them. The rest are about attracting and feeding them. That is the widest gap between harm done and hostility shown anywhere in the dataset — though see the caveat below, because deer are also the species this corpus is most likely to flatter.

3. Swimming pools decide which amphibians people tolerate

Frogs and toads eat slugs and mosquito larvae, and are searched for removal 99% of the time. Reading the actual phrases explains it: the dominant terms are about keeping frogs out of swimming pools, not out of gardens. Ducks follow the same pattern. People are not hostile to the animal — they are hostile to it being in the pool.

The numbers behind every bar

Animal Terms Monthly volume Care Removal Share removal
Pond fish 56 48,470 8,460 0 0%
Chickens 327 276,912 138,570 1,930 1.4%
Deer 152 67,020 5,600 590 9.5%
Squirrels 531 215,336 66,326 7,430 10.1%
Lizards 53 134,691 112,190 21,641 16.2%
Slugs & snails 45 21,510 4,990 1,030 17.1%
Chipmunks 50 17,940 6,260 1,640 20.8%
Wild birds 223 49,630 5,900 11,570 66.2%
Ducks 61 31,520 1,180 10,490 89.9%
Snakes 48 95,170 90 4,380 98%
Frogs & toads 63 25,660 210 21,160 99%
Groundhogs 9 7,140 50 6,560 99.2%
Moles 10 8,120 0 8,120 100%
Geese 21 5,300 0 4,290 100%

Method

The corpus is 43,306 backyard, gardening and animal search terms carrying Google Ads volume estimates. Every term naming exactly one animal was sorted by the language of the phrase into care (lifespan, diet, habitat, attracting, keeping), removal (get rid of, keep away, repel, deter, trap, proof against), danger (bites, disease, whether it can hurt you) or other. Terms naming two animals were discarded rather than guessed at.

An animal is reported only when it clears 5,000 total and 3,000 classified monthly searches. Without that floor, a species with two tagged phrases reads as 0% or 100% and gets quoted as though it were a finding. Bees, wasps and goats were excluded by it.

What this measure cannot tell you

  • It is a backyard gardening corpus, not a census of search. Hunting, livestock and professional pest-control terms are under-represented by construction. An animal whose main audience sits outside gardening — deer being the clearest case — reads friendlier here than it would nationally.
  • Intent is inferred from wording, not from the person. “What do squirrels eat” is counted as care. Some of those searchers are working out what to stop putting out.
  • Volumes are estimates. Google Ads rounds them into bands. They rank species against each other reliably and should not be quoted as absolute counts.

Using this data

The figures on this page are free to quote and republish with attribution to Grow In Backyard and a link to this page. The analysis is reproducible: scripts/research/animal_intent.py produces every number here from the source corpus. For the underlying dataset, a breakdown we have not published, or a comment for a story, email [email protected].

Backyard Weekly

What to plant this month

One email a week: what to plant now, what to fix, and what is worth buying. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Not ready to subscribe? The planting calendar is free and needs no email.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy. Grow In Backyard will never sell your address.